Legal Opinion
Akron Presform Mold Co. v. McNeil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1974No. Nos. 73-1555 to 73-1557PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The Akron Presform Mold Company (Presform) appeals from orders of District Judge Thomas D. Lambros granting summary judgment against it in its three actions for damages and injunctive relief under the antitrust laws. We affirm.
Presform, formerly a manufacturer of rotational casting machinery, filed complaints on July 3, 1968, alleging three different and unlawful conspiracies in restraint of trade and monopolization of the relevant market for rotationally casting plastics. Before presenting the factual allegations in each action, it is necessary to detail certain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Carl ROSE, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth DOLE, Secretary of Labor, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Willmar Poultry Company v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., and Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Arthur D. OTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIDLAND-ROSS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.