Legal Opinion

Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. Sullivan

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 22, 1991No. CIV 88-1881-PCT-CAM, CIV 89-0576-PCT-CAMPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM and ORDER

MUECKE, District Judge.

The following Amended Memorandum and Order is issued pursuant to the court’s Order of August 22, 1991, which addressed defendant Flagstaff Medical Center’s motion to clarify and other clerical errors contained in the initial Memorandum and Order filed August 9, 1991. The Amended Memorandum and Order contains no sub stantive changes from the Memorandum and Order filed August 9, 1991.

The court has carefully reviewed and considered • the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and the oral argument presented to the court, and concludes as…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Grant v. Trinity Health-MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API