Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Sullivan
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 1990No. Civ. A. 83-3771(SSB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
On March 29, 1989, this court entered an order to show cause why plaintiffs’ complaint in this class action lawsuit should not be dismissed in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 107 S.Ct. 2287, 96 L.Ed.2d 119 (1987), which held that the Secretary’s severity regulation, step two of his five-step sequential evaluation process for determining whether a disability claimant is disabled (hereinafter “step two”), was facially valid. 1 Plaintiffs challenge the validity of step two as applied to existing class members.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Dixon v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993