Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Sullivan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1992No. 83 Civ. 7001 (WCC), 83 Civ. 8264 (WCC), 83 Civ. 8609 (WCC) and 84 Civ. 0110 (WCC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
This class action was originally brought before Judge Lasker by applicants for and recipients of benefits based on disability under the federal Supplemental Security Income and Old Age Survivor’s and Disability Insurance (“OASDI”) programs, administered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary” or “Defendant”) pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq., to challenge the Secretary’s policy of denying benefits to claimants whose impairments are “not severe” without inquiry into the effect of claimants’…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Joslyn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Pronti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.