Legal Opinion

Mitchell Grain & Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1921No. 22,986PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Rice district court; Daniel A. Banta, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The Mitchell Grain & Supply Company, a corporation dealing in grain, live stock and coal, employed F. H. Biesemeyer as its manager, the Maryland Casualty Company executing a bond for him. He served in that capacity for about four years. His employer brought an action against the surety company alleging that he was short in his accounts. The plaintiff recovered judgment and the defendant appeals.

1. The trial was had without a jury. The court found a shortage evidenced by the difference between the cash shown by the books kept by the manager to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaware State Bank v. ColtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. DavenportSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Prosser Power Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Vilm Milling Co. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. World Exchange Bank v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Fitchburg Savings Bank v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Genesee Wesleyan Seminary v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API