Legal Opinion

HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1996No. C0-94-2115PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

In this case we are once again asked to consider whether requisite “special circumstances” exist to deviate from the general common law rule that one owes no duty to warn those endangered by the conduct of a third party. The complaint here alleged fraud and negligence claims against appellants, the owners and operators of the Eaton Mobile Home Park, arising out of incidents of sexual abuse of the respondent minor children perpetrated by another tenant in the trailer park. The district court granted appellants’ motions for summary judgment on the negligence allegation,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Andrade v. EllefsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Gritzner v. Michael R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Bjerke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API