Legal Opinion
Estate of Hood v. Rose
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 2003No. 02CA16PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kline, Judge.
{¶ 1} B. Viola Hood (“Hood”) appeals from the judgment of the Jackson County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the motion of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) for summary judgment. Hood claims that R.C. 3937.44 is unconstitutional. We disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I
{¶ 2} The parties do not dispute the relevant facts. On or about May 28, 1999, Floyd M. Rose negligently drove his automobile, causing it to collide with a separate automobile, driven by Ralph M. Hood. Both Mr. Hood and Mr. Rose died as a result of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gentile v. RistasOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- LaBounty v. Big 3 AutomotiveOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Great Lakes Window, Inc. v. Resash, Inc., 2006-T-0114 (10-5-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Heider v. SiemensOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Robinson v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.