Legal Opinion

Adamski v. B.U.C.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1959No. 5127 and 5128PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Two cases are before this court on appeals on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, in which the appellants, some 630 in number, are all similarly situated on claims of benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act of Ohio. The two cases are based on substantially identical records filed in this court, were heard together and will be referred to in the singular. Our conclusion reached in this opinion will be dispositive of both cases.

The appellants, hereinafter called claimants, are all employees of the Champion Spark Plug Company, Toledo, Ohio. Their claims for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. RoachOhio Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Basso v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. In Re AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Abate v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Fragola v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API