Legal Opinion

Arnott v. Arnott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2012No. 2010-2180PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In this certified-conflict case, we hold that an appellate court reviewing a declaratory-judgment matter should apply an abuse-of-discretion standard in regard to the trial court’s holding concerning the appropriateness of the ease for declaratory judgment, i.e., the matter’s justiciability, and should apply a de novo standard of review in regard to the trial court’s determination of legal issues in the case.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} This matter arises out of a controversy over a phrase in a trust; the language at issue established the calculation of the price of trust…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Saunders v. MortensenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. HeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of PiketonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. T & M Machines, L.L.C. v. Atty. Gen.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Cool v. FrenchkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API