Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Fischer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2007No. 20060153Published

1DissentCrothers, Justice

[¶ 20] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 21] The time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and cannot be waived by the supreme court. See, e.g., State v. Guthmiller, 497 N.W.2d 407 (N.D.1993). The supreme court may not extend the time to file a notice of appeal in this case. N.D.R.App.P. 26(b); cf. N.D.C.C. § 27-20-05 (supreme court may extend time for appeal under Juvenile Court Act). Here, the district court has exclusive jurisdiction to act on all motions for extensions of time to file the notice of appeal. N.D.R.App.P. 26(b).

[¶ 22] “In a criminal case, a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API