Taggart v. Bosch
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Clark, 'Judge. Action by Joe P. Taggart against John D. Bosch. Judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
This action is upon a promissory note alleged to have been made and delivered by the defendant' to the plaintiff on August 8, 1890, for the sum of $3,000, payable one year after date, with interest at seven per cent. The answer denies that defendant made, signed or delivered said note. The pleadings are verified. A jury trial was had, and resulted in a verdict for- the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The specifications upon which the motion for new trial was heard are: (1) Insufficiency of the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jackson v. Feather River & Gibsonville Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gale & Elliott v. Tuolumne Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Harrold v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Fuller v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Galindez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Quackenbush v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1915