Legal Opinion

Central Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1926No. 20065PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The result of the commission’s order is to give the Ohio Transit Company the right to put on 12 new busses for the purpose of operating-new schedules, to provide for through service from Columbus to Pomeroy not previously rendered, and to allow 8 round trips per day between Lancaster and Athens in addition to those which had been formerly operated by the applicant. Are these orders unreasonable and unlawful? The right to put on additional equipment and to operate new schedules between Columbus and Lancaster has been discussed in the case of Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Public Service Commission v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Railroad Commission v. L. S. Jackson D.B.A. Hub Motor LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API