Poe v. Canton-Mansfield Dry Goods Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLembrt, J.
This case is before this court in an error proceeding, for consideration of the ruling of the common pleas court on demurrer to the petition, raising the question whether the petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The effect of the demurrer is to deny the legal sufficiency of the petition, and raise issues of law upon the facts stated therein. The demurrer admits not only what is expressly alleged, but also whatever can be implied as fair and reasonable intendment from the allegations made.
The petition in this case is as follows:
“1. Comes now the plaintiff and for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Poland v. EarhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. WebsterOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- K-Mart Enterprises of Fla., Inc. v. KellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- LaCrone v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961