Legal Opinion

Bank of Minco v. Struss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from, the District Court of Canadian County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McAtee, J.:

This action was begun on the 20th day of December, 1893, in the district court of Canadian comity, by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against H. J. Boden and Samuel Strauss, to reoover the amount due on two prommissory notes aggregating twenty-five hundred dollars. Boden confessed judgment. The defendant, Strauss, filed his answer alleging several defenses.

A trial of the case was had before Hon. John H. Bur-ford, associate justice of the supreme court of this territory, assigned to the second judicial district, of which Canadian…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Earls v. EarlsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Baisley v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Cox v. State ex rel. WyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Pratt v. BrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Curlee v. RulandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Dobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API