Legal Opinion

Dobbs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1911PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We have been favored with able and exhaustive briefs and oral arguments supporting and in opposition to the motion for a rehearing.

First. It is admitted by counsel for appellant that the rule is correctly stated in Rasberry's Case, 4 Okla. Cr. 613,103 P. 865, to the effect that a judge pro tempore may fix the time within which a case-made may be prepared and served, and that when such time has expired, or he has vacated the bench as such judge pro tempore, he has no power to extend such time. But counsel earnestly contend that Judge James R. Tolbert was a judge of the state of Oklahoma, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Rasberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Blitz v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Bank of Minco v. StrussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. State v. WaltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API