Legal Opinion

Curlee v. Ruland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1915No. 6728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; T. L. Brown, Assigned Judge. Action between C. Z. Curlee and another and Harry E. Ruland. From the judgment the parties first mentioned bring error, and Ruland moves to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Defendant in error files motion to dismiss for the reason that the case-made herein was not settled and signed by the judge who tried the case at a time when he had authority or jurisdiction to do so. This case was tried before Hon. T. L. Brown, regular judge of the Second judicial district, who was assigned by the Chief Justice to hold a term of court in Oklahoma county. The trial commenced on the 12th day of February, 1914, the verdict being rendered on the 13th, motion for new trial filed the 13th, and overruled on the 14th, at which time plaintiff in error was allowed 60 days in which to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Dobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. RiderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Ragan v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Smiser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API