Legal Opinion

Blair v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 11, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00333Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION LORETTA BLAIR and RICHARD BLAIR, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-333-DJH-RSE JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC., Defendants. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Loretta Blair and Richard Blair allege that Loretta Blair was injured by a vaginal mesh implant manufactured by Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. (D.N. 1, PageID # 21) On May 1, 2019, the plaintiffs filed their 18-count complaint in this Court. (Id., PageID # 22-57) Defendants now seek dismissal of all claims against them…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API