Johnston v. Steele
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from the District Court of Carson County. Tried below before Hon. B. M. Baker.
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
The parties to this controversy were partners in handling sheep under a verbal contract which was subsequently reduced to writing and was as follows: “This agreement entered into this day between L. T. Johnston and Luther Steele, to the following effect: L. T. Johnston has leased and improved a certain pasture in Stonewall County, Texas, of thirteen (13) sections, one school section taken up by Luther Steele, upon which he has expended ($1000) one thousand dollars; that is, Johnston has expended $1000, more or less. Johnston has control of it.. Luther Steele has it…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bivins v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Masterson v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Paggi v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Bivins v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932