Legal Opinion

Moore v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1898No. 181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Republic district court; F. W. Sturges,. judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mahan, P. J. :

The plaintiff in error sought to enjoin the defendant in error from closing up a passageway under its tracks and over its right of way on his farm. He claimed an easement of a right of way under the track from one side of his farm to the other; that he had reserved this easement at the time lie-deeded to the defendant its right of way over his farm ; that by mistake, or through connivance of the agent-of the defendant company with whom he negotiated regarding the right of way, and who drew the deed at-the time, the reservation and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Cornell v. St. Louis, Kansas & Arizona Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Co. v. SchalanskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API