Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Co. v. Schalansky
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Smith district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*563The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of a traction engine.
The defendant contracted for an oil tractor and agreed to pay $2700 therefor. The contract contained these provisions:
“I agree to accept said machinery on arrival and pay freight and charges thereon from Wichita, Kansas. . . . It is expressly agreed that this order shall not become binding until accepted and approved by -an officer of the Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Company.”
The printed warranty on the contract…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Conaway v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. ClaudelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hickman v. CaveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Mid-West Lumber Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931