Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Co. v. Schalansky

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1917No. 20,859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Smith district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*563The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of a traction engine.

The defendant contracted for an oil tractor and agreed to pay $2700 therefor. The contract contained these provisions:

“I agree to accept said machinery on arrival and pay freight and charges thereon from Wichita, Kansas. . . . It is expressly agreed that this order shall not become binding until accepted and approved by -an officer of the Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Company.”

The printed warranty on the contract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Conaway v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. ClaudelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. CaveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Mid-West Lumber Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API