Legal Opinion
United States v. Sampson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 17, 2014No. Cr. No. 01-10384-MLWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
This Memorandum is based on the part of the transcript of the January 21, 2014 hearing in which the court explained its preliminary view that its recusal is not required under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) on the basis of its association with Assistant United States Attorney Zachary Hafer. This Memorandum adds headings and citations, clarifies and amplifies some language, and, in footnotes, addresses some subsequent events.
sjs Hí # #
I. INTRODUCTION
As suggested by the government in its December 20, 2013 submission, I have seriously considered whether I should now…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015