Legal Opinion

Gilbert's Ethan Allen Gallery v. Ethan Allen, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. 76481PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

Defendant Ethan Allen, Inc. (Ethan Allen), is a manufacturer and distributor of furniture. Defendant Bly & Sons, Inc. (Bly & Sons), and plaintiff Gilbert’s Ethan Allen Gallery are furniture dealers.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in the circuit court of Madison County alleging that defendants violated the Illinois Antitrust Act (the Illinois Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 60 — 1 et seq.). The trial court entered judgment against plaintiff and in favor of Bly & Sons. The trial court, however, found that Ethan Allen had violated section 3(3) of the Illinois Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. Pentech PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Baker v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API