Legal Opinion

Duskin v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1973No. Civ. 30321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal, sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of respondents, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and its executive director and commissioners (Agency) to a representative taxpayer’s suit filed by plaintiff Duskin on grounds of failure to state a cause of action.

On an appeal from a judgment of dismissal sustaining a demurrer, all of the facts set forth in the pleadings must be accepted as true. Duskin’s first amended complaint alleged the following causes of action: the first, based on the Community Redevelopment Law (Health &…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Los Altos Property Owners Assn. v. HutcheonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Cornelius v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Walker v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Taking Offense v. State of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Taking Offense v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API