Duskin v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal, sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of respondents, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and its executive director and commissioners (Agency) to a representative taxpayer’s suit filed by plaintiff Duskin on grounds of failure to state a cause of action.
On an appeal from a judgment of dismissal sustaining a demurrer, all of the facts set forth in the pleadings must be accepted as true. Duskin’s first amended complaint alleged the following causes of action: the first, based on the Community Redevelopment Law (Health &…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Los Altos Property Owners Assn. v. HutcheonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Cornelius v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Walker v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Taking Offense v. State of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2025
- Taking Offense v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025