Legal Opinion

Cellu Products Co. v. G.T.E. Products Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8525SC1386PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The test on a motion for summary judgment is whether the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Gregory v. Perdue, Inc., 47 N.C. App. 655, 267 S.E. 2d 584 (1980).

Defendants filed supporting affidavits showing that the initial sale of the Metalare lamps by G.T.E. to Mid-State, and subsequent sale by Mid-State to Bolick occurred no later than 30 August 1977. Wilkie completed all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Colony Hill Condominium I Ass'n v. Colony Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. American Travel Corp. v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Gillis v. Whitley's Discount Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Ronald G. Hinson Electric, Inc. v. Union County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. King v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Pyco Supply Co. Inc. v. American Centennial Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Moore Printing, Inc. v. Automated Print Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API