State v. Bailey
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant Jason Bailey appeals his conviction for criminal sexual contact of a minor in the second degree pursuant to NMS A 1978, Section 30-9-13(B) (2004). Defendant argues that the district court erred when it admitted evidence of uncharged bad acts under Rule 11-404(B) NMRA and Rule 11-403 NMRA. More specifically, Defendant argues that the district court erred when, mid-trial, it reversed an earlier ruling that excluded evidence of an alleged out-of-jurisdiction sexual act by Defendant against Child. Defendant argues that this evidence was propensity evidence and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. OttoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TorrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. VeletaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. CardenasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. MedranoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018