State v. Bailey

OPINION

VIGIL, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

{1} Defendant Jason Bailey appeals his conviction for second-degree criminal sexual contact of a minor pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 30-9-13(B) (2004). Defendant argues that admission of evidence of his uncharged conduct was improper under Rule 11-404(B)(1) NMRA and Rule 11-403 NMRA. Because the other-act evidence thatDefendant objects to was properly admitted for the purpose of demonstrating Defendant’s intent under Rule 11-404(B)(2), and the evidence was not unduly prejudicial under Rule 11-403, we affirm the conviction. And, by this opinion, we further…