Legal Opinion

Giovanella v. Conservation Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

This appeal asks us to define the “relevant parcel” in a regulatory takings analysis. The plaintiff, John M. Giovanella, owned two contiguous lots in Ashland. One of the lots contained a house. Giovanella sought an order of conditions from the defendant, the conservation commission of Ashland (commission), that would allow him to build a house on the other lot. The commission denied his request because construction of the house would intrude into the twenty-five foot buffer zone around a wetland on the lot, in violation of a local bylaw. Giovanella filed suit in the Superior Court, seeking…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. SBT HOLDINGS, LLC v. Town of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Blair v. Department of Conservation & RecreationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Smyth v. Conservation Commission of FalmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Executive Office of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API