Giovanella v. Conservation Commission
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
This appeal asks us to define the “relevant parcel” in a regulatory takings analysis. The plaintiff, John M. Giovanella, owned two contiguous lots in Ashland. One of the lots contained a house. Giovanella sought an order of conditions from the defendant, the conservation commission of Ashland (commission), that would allow him to build a house on the other lot. The commission denied his request because construction of the house would intrude into the twenty-five foot buffer zone around a wetland on the lot, in violation of a local bylaw. Giovanella filed suit in the Superior Court, seeking…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- SBT HOLDINGS, LLC v. Town of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Blair v. Department of Conservation & RecreationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Smyth v. Conservation Commission of FalmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Executive Office of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.