Blair v. Department of Conservation & Recreation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
The Watershed Management Act, G. L. c. 92Aih, §§ 1-20 (Act), is designed to protect certain water systems that are critical to the public water supply. The plaintiffs1 own lakefront property located within a 200-foot buffer zone created by the Act for land abutting particular sources of drinking water. Pursuant to G. L. c. 92Alh, § 5, alterations within that buffer zone are prohibited unless a variance is issued. The plaintiffs’ single-family home is located on the property. To increase the size of their lawn and double the extent of their existing sandy beach, the plaintiffs sought a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Burbank Apartments Tenant Association v. KargmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- ASHLEY M. MILLS v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD and AnotherMassachusetts Superior Court · 2024
- Fbt Everett Realty, LLC v. Massachusetts Gaming Commission v. Wynn Ma, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.