Legal Opinion
Penrod v. K&N Engineering, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 2, 2019No. 0:18-cv-02907Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Penrod, Gus Erpenbach, and Juan File No. 18-cv-02907 (ECT/LIB) Welsh, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER v. K&N Engineering, Inc., Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Matthew D. Schelkopf and Joseph B. Kenney, Sauder Schelkopf LLC, Berwyn, PA; Daniel E. Gustafson, Daniel C. Hedlund, Catherine K. Smith, and Ling S. Wang, Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Minneapolis, MN; and David C. Wright, McCune Wright Arevalo LLP, Ontario, CA,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.