Legal Opinion

Berghoff v. McDonald

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9189PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

This action was commenced by appellee against appellant in the Whitley Circuit Court, to recover two colts, where appellant filed a plea in abatement. Appellee, after demurring to that plea, was allowed by the court to amend his complaint, making new parties defendants Adam T. Mc-Ginley and Jacob Ruch. Appellant then filed a general denial and a special plea, and a change of venue was then taken by appellant to Kosciusko county. Issues were there formed by McGinley and Nueh, and by appellee’s filing a general denial to the special paragraph of Berghoff’s answer.

The record…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Myers v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Stott v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Smith v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bowen v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Riley v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Wright v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API