Barkley v. McClung Realty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
It is provided by statute in this State that “the plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, of legal or equitable nature, or both, when they all arise out of the same transaction, or transaction connected with the subject of the action.” C. S., 507.
Construing the provisions of this statute, it has been uniformly held by this Court that if the causes of action united in the same complaint be not entirely distinct and unconnected, if they arise out of one and the same transaction, or a series of transactions forming one course of dealing, and all tending to one end, if…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Daniels v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Fisher v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Town of Wllkesboro v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Gurganus v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Owen v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Holland v. . WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.