Legal Opinion

Cohn v. State Tax Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The plaintiff made his individual income tax return for the year 1923, in which he deducted $20,000 which he paid during that year on some notes which he had given in the preceding year in settlement of an action brought against him to recover damages. The defendant Tax Commission refused to allow the deduction and levied upon him an additional tax. He seeks to recover this with interest.

Having applied to the Commission for a revision, which was denied, he has brought this proceeding under Sections 30 and 31 of Chapter 316 of the General Laws of Oregon for 1925, reading thus:

“Section 30. A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. City of Portland v. NottinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith Securities Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Tazwell v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inland Navigation Co. v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Earle v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Timoney v. McIntireOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API