Legal Opinion

Timoney v. McIntire

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

On October 30, 1931, plaintiffs James F. Timoney and Adna M. Thayer, instituted a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant, Mrs. McIntire, and also to foreclose a mortgage alleged to have been executed by defendant, Shepherd. As to defendant, Shepherd, a demurrer to the complaint was sustained and the suit dismissed.

An amended complaint was filed and on January 27, 1932, a decree in favor of plaintiffs against defendant, McIntire, was filed foreclosing the mortgage executed by said defendant Mrs. McIntire. Said mortgage was decreed to be a purchase money mortgage, and in said decree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Security Savings Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Marquam v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Smith Securities Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Cartwright v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Salem King's Products Co. v. La FolletteOregon Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyon v. MazerisOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Engelson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API