Antowill v. Friedmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Joseph Friedmann, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 26th day of November, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury for $24,486, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of December, 1920, denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Mills, J.:
This action is one to recover damages for personal injuries which the plaintiff, the patient of defendant physician, claims to have received through his negligence in administering to her person X-ray treatment. There is really no dispute about the material facts, except in one respect, as hereinafter specified. Therefore, except as to that matter of controversy, I make the following brief summary of the material facts.
The defendant at the time was, and for several years before had been, a duly educated and licensed physician, specializing in the use of the rather modern method of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Butler v. RuleArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Kuehnemann v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Whitmore v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Parker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Berg v. WillettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.