Legal Opinion

Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1967No. 9097_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURRAH, Chief Judge.

Hidwestern Developments brought this action to quiet its title against the City of Tulsa to a strip of land 60 feet wide crossing a certain quarter section in Tulsa. The complaint contained a second count in reverse condemnation. A claim of requisite amount arising under federal statutes provides the necessary jurisdictional basis. And see Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Okla homa, 10 Cir., 333 F.2d 1009. 1 The land in suit previously comprised the north 60 feet of the 150 feet MK & T Railroad right-of-way. Under threat of condemnation, the railroad agreed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Woodville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. 635.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1970
  3. Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. DuncanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Sand Springs Home v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Devito v. UNITED STATES, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ETC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API