Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HURRAH, Chief Judge.
Hidwestern Developments brought this action to quiet its title against the City of Tulsa to a strip of land 60 feet wide crossing a certain quarter section in Tulsa. The complaint contained a second count in reverse condemnation. A claim of requisite amount arising under federal statutes provides the necessary jurisdictional basis. And see Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Okla homa, 10 Cir., 333 F.2d 1009. 1 The land in suit previously comprised the north 60 feet of the 150 feet MK & T Railroad right-of-way. Under threat of condemnation, the railroad agreed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Woodville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. 635.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1970
- Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. DuncanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Sand Springs Home v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Devito v. UNITED STATES, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ETC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.