Legal Opinion

Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. Duncan

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1976No. Civ. 75-0801-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge. .

In this case the Plaintiffs seek to quiet title in and to certain oil and gas leasehold estates in Section 1, Township 9 North, Range 10 West, Caddo County, Oklahoma against the Defendants. The Defendants by way of Counterclaim seek to quiet title in and to certain oil and gas leasehold estates in said Section against the Plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs claim that Defendants (1) had and have no standing as a lessee with reference to the drilling, of a well in said Section, (2) had and have no operating rights in said Section under the pooling order of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of GirardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  2. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Dudley v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Melcher v. CampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Simons v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferrell Construction Co. v. Russell Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Crest Resources and Exploration Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. French Energy, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Petroleum Energy, Inc. v. Mid-America Petroleum, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. Siniard v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API