Legal Opinion

Devito v. UNITED STATES, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ETC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-1383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

American courts, as dispute resolution forums, place upon litigants the burden to persuade. 1 Often this jurisprudential system forces judges, as arbiters, to rule in favor of either one litigant who urges strict, literal or general application of a law or legal principle as opposed to another litigant who pleads for a spirited or broad interpretation or a specific exception thereto. 2 In some situations the accepted legal principle clashes with the equities thereof and produces seemingly inhumanitarian results. 3 Other times, as in the case sub…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marshall Leasing, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. AnthonySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. United States v. United States Currency & Coin: $558,110.00District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. United States v. One 1981 Datsun 280ZX VIN: JN1HZ04S4BX407742District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. United States v. One Hughes HelicopterDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API