Legal Opinion

Babbitt & Cowden Livestock Co. v. Hooker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1925No. Civil No. 2289PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Babbitt & Cowden Live Stock Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed suit against C. H. Hooker, hereinafter called defendant, alleging substantially that on March 20th, 1922, plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of some thirty (30) registered Hereford bulls, worth $4,500, which were temporarily in the custody of the Blaney Land & Cattle Company; that defendant Hooker, with full knowledge of plaintiff’s rights, wrongfully took possession of and converted the same to his own use; that demand had been"made for the return of the animals, but it was refused by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Myer v. Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Nalbandian v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Land-Air, Inc. v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Arizona Commercial Mining Co. v. Iron Cap Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API