Legal Opinion

Lemaire v. Walsh

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1903No. 1641PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The record in this case is in two volumes: (1) The statement on motion for a new trial and on appeal as settled by the judge (pages 1 to 89). (2) The judgment roll and exhibits, taken up on the order of the judge (pages 1 to 56). The first will be referred to in this brief as the "Statement," and the second as "Judgment Roll and Exhibits."

I. This appeal is from both the judgment, and also from the order overruling and denying the motion for a new trial. (Judgment Roll and Exhibits, 48.)

II. Walsh alone has appealed. Therefore only such errors as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Garwood v. GarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Lemasters v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Springmeyer v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Peccole v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API