State v. Schull
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant was convicted under count 2 of the information which charged him with the violation of chapter 12 of the Special Session Daws for 1933, and acts amendatory thereof. The information alleged that the defendant, who- was the holder of a class D license for the retail sale of nonintoxicating beer, “did 'wilfully and unlawfully sell Harry Schnackenberg, a person under the age of 18 years, a pitcher of non-intoxicating beer.” The defendant has appealed from the final judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a n6w trial.
We interpret the record as showing that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- McCutcheon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HartfielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. KlueberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Hershorn v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- State v. Hy Vee Food Stores, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.