Legal Opinion

State v. Schull

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1938No. File No. 8153PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant was convicted under count 2 of the information which charged him with the violation of chapter 12 of the Special Session Daws for 1933, and acts amendatory thereof. The information alleged that the defendant, who- was the holder of a class D license for the retail sale of nonintoxicating beer, “did 'wilfully and unlawfully sell Harry Schnackenberg, a person under the age of 18 years, a pitcher of non-intoxicating beer.” The defendant has appealed from the final judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a n6w trial.

We interpret the record as showing that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. McCutcheon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. HartfielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. KlueberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hershorn v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. State v. Hy Vee Food Stores, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API