Legal Opinion
Gorecki v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 31, 1975No. 6882PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Appeal by the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security from a de novo determination by the Superior Court (Johnson, J.) that the plaintiff was not disqualified for benefits under RSA 282:4 F (Supp. 1973) because the work stoppage for the four weeks ending November 27 through December 8, 1971, was due solely to a lockout. RSA 282:4 F (3). This was contrary to a decision by the department’s appeal tribunal that plaintiff’s unemployment was due to an existing labor dispute and not to a lockout. “By order of the Court, without objection, this finding shall apply to all cases of other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Febbi v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment SEC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Be-Mac Transport Co. v. GrabiecAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- City Pattern v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Furber v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- MEMCO v. Maryland Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Wellborn Paint Manufacturing Co. v. New Mexico Employment Security DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- McIntire v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Airport Casino, Inc. v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.