Legal Opinion

Wellborn Paint Manufacturing Co. v. New Mexico Employment Security Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1984No. 7487PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Wellborn Paint Manufacturing Company (“Wellborn”) appeals the district court’s affirmance of a decision by the New Mexico Employment Security Department (“ESD”). ESD’s decision declared certain employees of Wellborn eligible for benefits under the New Mexico Unemployment Compensation Act (“Act”), NMSA 1978, Sections 51-1-1 to -54 (Repl.Pamp.1983) for a period during which Wellborn instituted a lockout. We reverse.

Wellborn and union officials began negotiations in November 1982 to replace the collective bargaining agreement that would expire on January 5, 1983. By January…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Salazar v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Laughlin v. LaughlinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Buchholz v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Owens Ex Rel. Owens v. Leavitts Freight Service, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. State Engineer v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Citizens for Incorporation, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Anderson v. BD. OF REV. OF INDUS. COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API