Legal Opinion

Allis v. Allis

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1965No. 4915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

By this appeal we are asked to reverse an order directing a husband to pay $18,500 in fees to his wife’s attorney. The request rests on the proposition that the wife was not shown to be in necessitous circumstances. The financial position of wife and husband was disparate. The wife possessed $25,000 to $40,000 in liquid assets, while the husband was worth approximately three-quarters of a million dollars. In directing the husband to pay the wife’s counsel fees, the lower court expressed its view that the great difference in their financial position was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Effinger v. EffingerNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kapp v. District Court of the Seventh Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kapp v. KappNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Black v. BlackNevada Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Day v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Day v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Day v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API