Day v. Day
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
417 P.2d 914 (1966)
82 Nev. 317
Fairfield Pope DAY, Appellant and Cross-Respondent,
v.
Frances Statter DAY, Respondent and Cross-Appellant.
No. 5048.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
September 9, 1966.
John P. Thatcher, Reno, for appellant and cross-respondent.
Leslie B. Gray, Reno, for respondent and cross-appellant.
OPINION
COLLINS, Justice.
The parties were formerly husband and wife. Hereafter, appellant and cross-respondent will be referred to as Fairfield, while respondent and cross-appellant will be referred to as Frances. They were divorced in Reno in 1949. The decree approved an agreement between the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corbridge v. CorbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Goodman v. GoodmanNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Mooty v. MootySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Shuff v. FulteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.