Legal Opinion

Day v. Day

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1966No. 5048Published

1Opinion of the Court

417 P.2d 914 (1966)

82 Nev. 317

Fairfield Pope DAY, Appellant and Cross-Respondent,

v.

Frances Statter DAY, Respondent and Cross-Appellant.

No. 5048.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

September 9, 1966.

John P. Thatcher, Reno, for appellant and cross-respondent.

Leslie B. Gray, Reno, for respondent and cross-appellant.

OPINION

COLLINS, Justice.

The parties were formerly husband and wife. Hereafter, appellant and cross-respondent will be referred to as Fairfield, while respondent and cross-appellant will be referred to as Frances. They were divorced in Reno in 1949. The decree approved an agreement between the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Corbridge v. CorbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Goodman v. GoodmanNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Mooty v. MootySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Shuff v. FulteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API