Legal Opinion

Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Graham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1989No. 25A03-8809-CV-270PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company appeals a trial court decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendants and intervenors.

The facts relevant to this appeal disclose that the Grahams have a hog operation. In February 1984, the Grahams became aware that their herd had contracted pseudora-bies, an infectious disease for hogs whose primary impact is felt when the disease infects breeding herds.

As a result of the infection, the Grahams’ farm was quarantined. The Indiana State Board of Health regulations require vaccination, tagging, and filing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Moll v. South Central Solar Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Trisler v. Indiana Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. General Housewares Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. National Fire and Casualty Company v. Mary A. West, a Minor Child, by and Through Her Parent and Next Friend, Rita NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API