Legal Opinion
Swartz v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 17, 1984No. 83-2975C(5)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
589 F.Supp. 743 (1984)
Homer R. SWARTZ, Plaintiff,
v.
NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.
No. 83-2975C(5).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
July 17, 1984.
George O. Suggs, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Robert D. Tucker, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion for summary judgment. Briefs and exhibits have been submitted by both parties.
The Court, having thoroughly reviewed all materials submitted by the parties, is of the opinion that defendant's motion should be granted. Plaintiff's claim is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- J. C. Bonnot, D/B/A Bonnot Construction Company v. Congress of Independent Unions Local 14Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen B. Atkins v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Ruth C. Hoffman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Atkinson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Bond v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1984
- Larry E. Collins John K. Grauberger Phil J. Chapple v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.