Legal Opinion
Bond v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided November 16, 1984No. CV. 84-0-36PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Filing No. 14). After review of the pleadings and of the briefs filed in support of and in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss, and having considered the arguments of counsel raised at the hearing in this matter, the Court concludes that defendant’s motion to dismiss is well taken and should be granted.
As alleged in the amended complaint, the facts are these. On October 20, 1982, the Interstate Commerce Commission issued an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Margaret E. KOKE and Anna C. Koke, Appellants, v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC., and Kingsley O. Wright, Sr., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Swartz v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen B. Atkins v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Ruth C. Hoffman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Adams v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Atkinson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Larry E. Collins John K. Grauberger Phil J. Chapple v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.