Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 16, 1995No. 07-95-0156-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

The State of Texas appeals from an interlocutory decree entitled “Order Suppressing Evidence” and cites three points of error. All three pertain to the court’s decision to exclude statements uttered by third parties who allegedly assisted Thomas Howard in robbing and killing a local store owner. For the reasons which follow, we dismiss for the lack of jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction

The power of this court to entertain interlocutory appeals is quite limited. Unless authorized to hear same by statutory or constitutional dictate, we have no jurisdiction to do so. Here, the State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. State v. CarneyMontana Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. State v. StrizichMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. LizzolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Santa Fe v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. Medrano, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API