Legal Opinion

State v. Medrano

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 18, 1999No. 08-97-00492-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSAN LARSEN, Justice.

This is an attempted State’s appeal from the trial court’s order granting a motion to exclude hypnotically enhanced identification from introduction at trial. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

FACTS

On October 5, 1996, a pizza delivery man was shot and killed at 221 South Carolina Street, El Paso, Texas. At the time of the shooting, J.E., a fourteen-year-old girl, was in the front yard of her home down the street. J.E. gave a statement to the police about the events of that night, including a description of the shooter and the car he rode in.

On October…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. State v. DeAngelis, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  4. State v. Medrano, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
  5. State v. Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API