Legal Opinion

State v. Lizzol

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2007No. 30,019PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁYEZ, Chief Justice.

{1} This case presents us with an opportunity to clarify whether the State may appeal the dismissal of a case based on a judge’s decision to exclude evidence for lack of foundation. We hold that double jeopardy principles do not allow the State to appeal in such circumstances. Because of our holding, we do not reach the issue of whether the judge’s evidentiary ruling in this case was in error.

I. BACKGROUND

{2} In the early morning of January 17, 2004, Officer Tanner Tixier of the Albuquerque Police Department pulled over Defendant Mark Lizzol for chiving without…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. City of Las Cruces v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Santa Fe v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API